The Benefits Of Animation In Law Court
The opposing expert should admit that the Law graphic he is using is accurate but give reasons for not being extremely accurate. For example, he should admit that the product liability graphic is accurate based on car schematics, but then explain why he cannot be more precise. The animation itself should not be fabricated evidence, but be based on actual reports, testimony, and data. That way, both sides can agree that it is not inaccurate.
Courtroom Animation
Animation is a staple of video games and entertainment industry. New technologies have made legal animation accessible to everyone. Now, a single animation can convey all the details of a legal case at a fraction of the cost. A lawyer can use a simple 2D animation to explain their case to jurors. A 3D animation will give jurors a better understanding of what the case is about than a static photo.
When considering courtroom animation for a law case, the team at Legal Depiction prides itself on consultation with clients. They review the parameters of the case and develop a storyboard that best supports the case. Based on the approach, the team also evaluates all visual elements to make sure they are technically accurate and tell the story in the most effective way possible. Additionally, depending on the purpose of the graphic, 3D animation can be a powerful tool for mediations, trial presentations, or interactive presentations.
Trial graphics teams have years of experience with the oil and gas industry. Cases they’ve worked on include the toxic effects of hydrogen sulfide, the failure of a blowout preventer, falling pipes, and tongs, and pipeline leaks. Other cases feature produced saltwater contaminating the surface. The jury will be moved by the video. So, in the next legal case, consider using courtroom animation.
Courtroom Animation’s Team Of Visual Strategists, Designers And Developers
The use of high-quality trial graphics is an important part of a winning courtroom presentation strategy. Jurors watch media presentations on a daily basis. Using effective technology and carefully crafted law graphics can help you persuade them. Graphic images can help simplify complex legal strategies. These images include videos, charts, and graphs. They can also assist in debating complex legal arguments.
Courtroom Animation has experience creating both plaintiff and defense-centered legal graphics. One example was a medical malpractice case. The plaintiff’s attorney used courtroom animation to present the case. The animation depicted the effects of a medical misdiagnosis on a patient, which resulted in lifelong medical conditions. While this case was successfully settled, the jury could not remember all of the details after the break.
Trial graphics are not as detailed as full-blown animation, but they are far more affordable than full-blown animated exhibits. Interactive timelines, maps, and processes help viewers understand the factors and events that led to a specific event or decision. Animations help jurors grasp key concepts and impress attorneys while enabling them to reach fair judgments. In addition, interactive motions for summary judgments can help convince jurors to side with the plaintiff.
Courtroom Animation’s Team Of Animators
A courtroom animation can be used to simplify complex scientific processes. For example, jurors can see a re-creation of an accident or sinkhole, a complex chart, or a timeline depicting key testimony. The correct animation can explain the case better than a static photo. This type of animation is becoming an essential part of the presentation for the best legal teams.
The courtroom is an environment that encourages emotion, and the right visual image can influence juries. The right way to use these visuals can sway a jury’s mind or compel them to view a problem in a different light. Courtroom Animation’s team of animators creates law graphics to help attorneys stand out from the crowd. Their legal graphics separate the signal from the noise.
Trial lawyers can use law animation as an excellent tool for explaining complex legal issues. The trial lawyer mapped out themes to include in the animation. The trial lawyer and animators met frequently to discuss important design decisions. The team compiled themes based on the case and sought input from the inventor and expert. The result was a compelling animation that made the jury agree. The jury found willful infringement of the patent.
